Posts Tagged ‘science’

Levitation

September 10th, 2009

There has been news of scientists levitating mice to study the effects of bone loss…never mind why they were doing it; how cool is that? A levitating mice!

The news article only says that magnetic fields were used to levitate the mice, but it doesn’t go into any details. Last time I studied biology and physics, living things aren’t very magnetic, so I had to find out if this is a hoax. Turns out it is possible, but it requires a very powerful magnet.

From wikipedia

A substance that is diamagnetic repels a magnetic field. All materials have diamagnetic properties, but the effect is very weak, and is usually overcome by the object’s paramagnetic or ferromagnetic properties, which act in the opposite manner. Any material in which the diamagnetic component is strongest will be repelled by a magnet, though this force is not usually very large.
Diamagnetic levitation can be used to levitate very light pieces of pyrolytic graphite or bismuth above a moderately strong permanent magnet. As water is predominantly diamagnetic, this technique has been used to levitate water droplets and even live animals, such as a grasshopper and a frog. However, the magnetic fields required for this are very high, typically in the range of 16 teslas, and therefore create significant problems if ferromagnetic materials are nearby.

The alleged first living animal to be levitated by this technique was a frog Here’s a short video of one:

I wonder we’ll see this done to humans. The frog is levitated using 10 Tesla magnetic fields, so it would take a much stronger magnet to lift a human being–much stronger than the current strongest man made magnet which is only 45 Tesla.

Aside: Yogis in India claims have been able to levitate as a result of spiritual powers, but they weren’t being completely honest.

[video]Visualizing 10 dimensions

August 19th, 2009

Simple yet effective educational video on how we can imagine 10 dimensions. Most people have trouble imagining 4 dimensional objects, so trying to get someone to imagine 6 more is an ambitious task. This is a hard problem that Rob Bryanton is attempting to solve through this video. He does so through analogies and reducing the problem into simpler ones. i.e. reducing higher dimensions into lower ones.

The supposed connection and analogies he makes towards string theory and the physical world are wrong according to physicists, so don’t take them seriously. Nevertheless, it’s a great educational video to help you understand a beautiful idea. :)

Braess’s Paradox On The Road

August 8th, 2009

Interesting research that finds evidence of Braess’s paradox in greedy traffic route optimization:

Imagine two routes to a destination, a short but narrow bridge and a longer but wider highway. Let’s also imagine that the combined travel times of all the drivers is shortest if half take the bridge and half take the highway. But because each driver is selfishly trying to seek the shortest route for himself, this doesn’t happen. At first, everyone will go for the bridge because it’s shorter. But then, as the bridge becomes backed up, more drivers start taking the highway, until the congestion on the bridge starts to clear up. At that point more drivers go back to the bridge, which then becomes backed up again. Eventually, the traffic flow settles into what’s called the Nash equilibrium (named for the beautifully minded mathematician), in which each route takes the same amount of time. But in this equilibrium the travel time is actually longer than the average time it would take if half of the drivers took each route.

Very counterintuitive!