Posts Tagged ‘psychology’

Are successful people happy?

March 7th, 2010

The question came up in conversation the other day and got me thinking. It seems like a lot of highly successful people are depressed. We asked ourselves why that might be and here are our hypotheses. When we were talking about successful we were talking about the outliers kind of successful people, the CEOs of major banks, best selling authors, etc.

  • Getting to where they are is stressful. Your work can become your life.
  • If success means having influence, people are going to criticize you for decisions you make, especially if those decisions affect them.
  • People tend to congregate with others who have similar interests and social statuses, but not many people get to be best selling authors, so it might be harder to find real friends.
  • No one else is doing what they’re doing, their future is more uncertain and there’s more pressure on them to make the right choices

However, most extremely successful people seem pretty happy, and the group as a whole are probably a lot happier than those working 80 a week in an investment bank, so it makes me wonder, why did we get that impression in the first place. The suicide rate is highest among high stress professions like dentistry and law, if there was a quantifiable measure of depression that could be applied to those professions and if we grouped the highly “successful” people in a group and measured them, I suspect that they won’t be any more unhappy than the most stressful professions out there.

  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

The Structure Of Fundemental Human Needs

July 26th, 2009

Anthony Robbins evangelized the six primal human needs as

  1. Certainty – the need for certainty of having food and shelter. This encompasses the physical needs that a human needs to survive.
  2. Variety – the need to change ones state of existence away from a state of restlessness.
  3. Significance – the need to feel special and recognized.
  4. Connection/Love – the need for interaction with other people. Depression is a symptom of the lack of 3 and 4.
  5. Growth – the need to grow with knowledge, experience, age, and wisdom. Everyone is either growing or dying. This is different from variety in that this is the spiritual need for positive change.
  6. Contribution – the need to give back to others, the satisfaction of feeling you’ve helped someone or you mean to something to someone else.

Anthony ordered these needs from physical to spiritual. As one slowly fulfill the physical needs, there is a greater desire for fulfillment. Interestingly, those living in poverty can still fulfill some of the spiritual needs without fulfilling the physical ones. This gives them the will to survive and grow. There is meaning in this ordering of needs, but it’s not a strict hierarchy.

Abraham Maslow has a different view of the fundamental human needs in which needs are arranged in a pyramid much like the food pyramid.
» Read more: The Structure Of Fundemental Human Needs

  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Energize with Food for Thought

July 8th, 2009

If you’re having a bad week in your job where most of what you do is sit and read or write whether it’s letters, emails, computer programs, anything, how do you stay motivated? Even if you’re a naturally energetic person, such passive activities will suck the energy right out of you like a black hole. You’re a social animal, just like the person sitting adjacent to you, why not take a break and chat for a few minutes every so often? Take a short break, walk around and get some snacks. Don’t go to a vending machine, go to a shop where you’ll interact with people, even if it’s just small talk. If you’re at a job where you can’t be social, then quit right away because it’s not worth it. That’s coming from an introvert! You’ll be depressed, it will ruin your night because you’ve lost the energy to live and do something interesting, your mental health will decay and your physical health will follow.

Socializing is energizing and you need energy to live, if you’re not living you’re rotting. I’m not talking about physical energy, and yes you also need that to live, but psychological energy–the energy that you feel you have. The fact that you feel energetic after being physically exaulsted means that  you’ve had a good time. You eat to to replenish physical energy, and similarly you socialize to replenish psychological energy, it’s the food of the brain.

The term “food for thought” colloquially refers to challenging problems that are supposed to stimulate and energize your brain. That’s a misnomer. Challenging and interesting problems are exercise for the brain, not food. When was the last time you heard someone recommend ‘challenging puzzles’ as a remedy for depression? When you are depressed you need energy, and you need food, not exercise. Colloquial food for thought only becomes “food” for thought when you face an interesting problem and you begin a dialog with yourself. Everyone has a mental voice, and when you’re thinking, you are constantly challenging yourself. “What if things behave this way instead of that way?”, “what if I did this instead of that?” and you answer your own questions. Your brain is simulating two brains in a dialog. This is more evident when you’re thinking about social situations where you think about talking to your friends and predict their response based on your mental image of them. Sometimes you might even get ‘worked up’ by your thoughts of social situations, at least then you feel angry, happy or upset; not depressed and lonely. It’s still energy and you can convert happiness, anger or sadness to other emotions and be overwhelmed by them. You can’t do the same with loneliness.

So if you’re bored and lonely, take a break from your routines and get some real food for thought.

  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Stereotyping Social Circles

July 5th, 2009

If you’re someone who has friends in different social groups, then you might realise that some social groups have very different personalities and some will never get along with one another. Here are my observations of four groups of people I associate with.

The Geeks

Geeks are a cynical bunch, especially computer geeks. They like intelligent humour often in the form of satire and sarcasm. They complain about the world around them, they demand things to be better and mock the status quo. They value displays of intelligence over anything else and criticise incompetence. They’re passionate about some subjects and will defend their opinion or attack an apposing opinion at the expense of social relationships. They’re smart and creative at heart, but often misunderstood.

The Business Types

They’re conservative and well mannered. They’re career oriented and value social status. They do things that ‘look good on their resume’ and prefer to keep their social lives private. They value presentation over content, and don’t mind a cheesy catch phrase or pun. They prefer structure over chaos–they are risk averse. They appreciate hard work and compliment others when compliment is due. They like to network with people with similar interests.

The Med Students

Med students are “normal” and have well balanced social lives. They’re down to earth. They’re naturally book smart but tries not to show it. They’re also emotionally intelligent and get along with everyone. They party hard and study hard. Their jokes are playful and rarely genuinely hurtful.

The Engineers

Engineers are smart and practical. They prefer facts over speculation and pragmatism over ideology. They enjoy a beer or two while watching Sunday night footy. They speak with their actions more than their words.

  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Are we in control of our decisions?

June 14th, 2009

It turns out we’re not. This videos shows some shoking experiments done to show that people make irrational decisions when there is a default decision that’s already made, and a problem designer can influence people’s decisions by changing these defaults.

Behavioral economics Dan Ariely the author of Predictably Irrational, uses classic visual illusions and his own counterintuitive (and sometimes shocking) research findings to show how we’re not as rational as we think when we make decisions.

Interestingly, given two different choices A and B each with percentage of preference 50%, adding a third choice A2 that is just like A but not as good (so the preference between A and A2 is 100% vs 0%), A suddenly becomes more attractive, even more so than B. This is a similar to but not quite like the independence of irrelevant alternatives condition in voting systems where a third loosing candidate can steal the win away from the winning candidate by taking his votes. This consequence has a lot of applications in marketing. Simply by offering worse but very similar alternatives to the product that you’re trying to sell, it’s possible to make your product look better than competitor products! Although this would only work if the competitors product quite different, but still a substitute to yours.

Perhaps the most remarkable experiment was one given to doctors. A patient is about to be sent for hip replacement, but one group of doctors was given another decision, they can pull the patient back from the surgery and give them ibuprofen instead. It’s obvious that ibuprofin is a much better alternative than hip replacement, so the doctors would decide to pull the patient back. The other group of doctors was given ibuprofen and piroxicam as alternatives. The doctors chose to let the patient go through with the hip replacement. This is worrying indeed. Piroxicam and ibuprofen are obvious better alternatives, but since the doctors would have to make another choice to choose between Piroxicam or ibuprofen, it makes the decision all of the sudden more complicated, they don’t know what to do and choose to let the patient stay on his default path.

This is similar to the concept of paralysis presented by Barry Schwartz on the paradox of choice. When you have too many choices of similar value, the choice becomes more difficult and you are unhappy as a result even if all choices are good ones. The opportunity cost of choosing one over another seem higher.

Both the books ‘The Paradox of Choice’ and ‘Predicably Irrational’ has been added to my reading list.

  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Effect of typos in resumes

March 7th, 2009

A study on the effects of typos and ugly resumes

Overall ratings were significantly lower when respondents had hiring experience, both for resumes with typos and for ugly resume. Typos again resulted in the lowest ratings of all. If anything, people with hiring experience were tougher on typos.

The take-home message: If you have a limited amount of time to work on your resume, you should spend it proofreading, not making it look prettier. That said, as many respondents indicated, the resume is just one factor in a hiring decision, and several respondents said they would ask both candidates to an interview before making their decision.

This is good advice. Proof read before you worry about the visuals

  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark

Imaginary Social Constraints

January 29th, 2009

For the past few month, I’ve had quite a few ideas for blog posts that remain reluctantly unwritten. The main reason was that this blog was being imported into my facebook, and although this is a public blog, I didn’t want those posts to be ‘announced’ to my facebook friends.

There is a fear that having them see those posts might make them change their opinions of me–for better or for worse. Although those people might find and read my posts here anyway, I feel more comfortable writing if it isn’t announced to everyone I know. Realistically, this fear is purely psychological, the ‘threat’ isn’t there. Most of my friends won’t read what I write, and even fewer if any will judge me on what I write. Besides, what do I care if someone judges me about what I write? Fear is irrational sometimes, but as a [de]motivator, it is much more powerful than reason.

The limbic sytem of our brain that controls our emotions and behavior has been around since the mamalian brain. It governs our instinctive behavior towards fear which is to mitigate the threat that’s triggering the fear. It’s constantly making subconscious judgements about the enviroment to regulate our emotions. When I’m aware that my post will be announced on facebook, my insecurity about what I’m writing creates a sense of fear and I respond instinctively by ceasing my writing efforts. The pre-frontal cortex of the brain controls the higher level reasoning and planning associated with the modern human behavior. It is much slower than the limbic system, but it is much better at long term decisions. My analysis of my insecurity revealed that my limbic system has made an irrational decision about ceasing my writing efforts. The threat simply didn’t exist. Yet I realize that the limbic system has a much greater control over our behaviour as a response to our emotions. The prefrontal cortext has more control over our behavior when we’re not experiencing any strong emotions like fear, anxiety or anger, and without those emotions, we can make better decisions. Otherwise, the response chemicals released by the limbic system is too strong and as a result we might behave irrationally.

I have this blog here for 4 reasons:

1. To improve my writing skills.

2. To rant about things that are interesting, annoying, remarkable, [insert adjective] to me.

3. To reveal more about who I am to friends and the world.

4. To bookmark thoughts that I have had that might be useful to me or anyone else in the future.

Having these posts published on facebook automatically was keeping me from doing 1 and 2, but it does do 3. Removing it from automatic posting will trade 3 for 1 and 2, And given that those 4 things are arranged roughly according to importance, I think it’s a good trade off, especially if it means more posts here more often.

  • Twitter
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Share/Bookmark