Posts Tagged ‘google’

My Lists Problem

August 23rd, 2009

I like lists. Lists are simple one dimensional structures. They can be ordered, or chaotic. I make lots of them, and you probably do too.

I have a list of things to do, a list of books I want to read, a list of websites in my bookmarks, a list of good ideas, a list of quotes from various famous people, and many more.

The problem is that they’re not all in one place. Some of those lists live only on my mind because it’s too inconvenient to write them down especially when chances are I’m going to lose them anyway.

I want a better way to manage my lists. Google Tasks is great for managing my todo lists, and any lists that where items are frequently added and removed, because it’s convenient to do so. But it’s messy. Each list needs it’s own category, but no sub categories, no tags, no way to order those categories. If you have lots of lists, Google Tasks just doesn’t scale to meet your needs.

I want lists to be available where ever I go, I want to be able to share my lists with other people, I want my lists to be searchable, tag-able, and scalable.

Do other people have list problems? Maybe I should try and solve it.

This Is Why Sms Is Expensive, And Google Is Trying To Solve This Problem

August 19th, 2009

A few days ago I posed the question, “why is sms so expensive?“. In a related opinion article on the Wall Street Journal, Why AT&T Killed Google Voice, Andy Kessler explains how Google voice is bringing real competition to the market.

With Google Voice, you have one Google phone number that callers use to reach you, and you pick up whichever phone—office, home or cellular—rings. You can screen calls, listen in before answering, record calls, read transcripts of your voicemails, and do free conference calls. Domestic calls and texting are free, and international calls to Europe are two cents a minute. In other words, a unified voice system, something a real phone company should have offered years ago.

[...]

As any parent of teenagers knows, text messages are 20 cents each, or $5,000 per megabyte. After the first month and a $320 bill, we all pony up $10 a month for unlimited texting plans. Same for Internet access. With my iPhone, I pay $30 a month for unlimited data service (actually, one gigabyte per month). Is it worth that? The à la carte price for other not-so-smart phones is $5 per megabyte (one-thousandth of a gigabyte) per month. So we buy monthly plans. Margins in AT&T’s Wireless segment are an embarrassingly high 25%.

The trick in any communications and media business is to own a pipe between you and your customers so you can charge what you like. Cellphone companies don’t have wired pipes, but by owning spectrum they do have a pipe and pricing power.

Aren’t there phone competitors to knock down the price? Hardly. Verizon Wireless, T-Mobile and others all joined AT&T in bidding huge amounts for wireless spectrum in FCC auctions, some $70-plus billion since the mid-1990s. That all gets passed along to you and me in the form of higher fees and friendly oligopolies that don’t much compete on price. Google Voice is the new competition.

AT&T has an exclusive deal with apple in the US, and this, Mr. Kessler leads us to believe, is part of the reason why Apple rejected the Google Voice iPhone App.

There should be more companies like Google.

Why Your Business Name is Important for Google

July 24th, 2009

Google has trillions of web pages in it’s indices, how are your customers going to find your website out of the hundreds of competitors out there?

When you’re picking a name, run it past Google. If you see a website url or website title that matches that name, then you already have stiff competition because someone else has already established a top position for that key word. Even if the top websites that come up aren’t competing businesses, the fact that they come up first when you search for them means that you’ll have to compete with them for that key word.

Here are some tips for picking Google friendly business names:

  1. Don’t pick names or phrases with ambiguous meanings or results. “Candy Shop” is a horrible name for a business even if you’re in the confectionery industry because it’s a song by 50cents. Not only will you be competing against other confectionery companies, but you’ll be competing against 50cents and you’re almost guaranteed to loose.
  2. Pick a name that currently has no Google ads appearing in search results. Google Adwords operate on a keyword based auction system, so if you want to advertise your business with Google ads, it’s much cheaper for you to be the first ad that comes up. If there is no competition, then you’ve already won the advertising war. Furthermore, having high ranking ads is a quick way to gain page rank if people find you to be more relevant.
  3. Don’t pick names where someone else has already established a dominant search position. ‘watch it’ is a bad name because a Canadian watch company is the obvious first result that comes up.
  4. The easiest way to win is to be the only one competing. This tip speaks for itself and generalizes the three points above.

All these tips tell you to avoid competition if you can, which is especially relevant if you’re a niche business. They’re not as relevant if you’re trying to take over the top position for a key word. That’s much harder to do and much more expensive. If you’re just starting out (the picking a name stage generally counts as “starting out”), then you want to avoid that until you have the resources to do so.

You don’t need the most relevant key word to your business, because the most relevant keyword for you maybe the most relevant keyword for a lot of other people and you’ll end up sharing that “relevance” if you’re competing against them. Think of a niche name for your business, so when people search for you, that’s the first thing that comes up because no one else has tried to use that name before.

I don’t mean to pick names that are completely meaningless one word utterances like a lot of “web2.0″ companies are doing because they’re hard to remember and it’s easy for a customer to forget what services you actually provide. For that to work, you have to wow your customers to make sure the remember you and make them keep coming back. That in itself is hard enough. Instead pick a name that’s relevant to your business, so you’ll be remembered. If they can remember your name, then they will be able to search for you. The most searched term on Google in the last few month has been “facebook”. People will search your name on Google even if the URL is obvious!

To recap. Pick a business name that
1) is relevant to what you do – because you want to be remembered
2) avoids search keyword competition – why make it harder on yourself when you don’t have to?

google: “we’re casual because it makes us productive”

July 16th, 2009

I recently attended at talk at the google plex sydney organised by the Young Leaders Network.

There was a lot of interest from the audience about their casual work environment. The googlers where quick to point out that they didn’t choose to be casual because they wanted to be different, they have a casual work environment because people are more productive when they are comfortable, and comfortable means casual for a lot of people.

Productivity drives their choice in corporate culture, not the other way around. That really is a profound yet intuitive approach. A truly google way of thinking.

Twitter isn’t that great

June 16th, 2009

Just saw a post about google suggest for ‘work is’ showing that people hate their jobs, so I tried one for twitter.

According to google suggest:

twitter is crap 5,900,000 results
twitter is a waste of time 3,410,000 results
twitter is lame 2,590,000 results
twitter is over capacity 1,200,000 results
twitter is down 60,900,000 results
twitter israel 4,020,000 results
twitter is for losers 967,000 results
twitter issues 64,000,000 results
twitter is for twits 495,000 results
twitter is not email 35,600,000 results

All negative.

Interestingly if you search ‘work is f’, “work is fun” comes up with 363 million results, so it’s not all bad out there! Searching for ‘twitter is g’ also returns 96 million results for twitter. I wonder why google returns the most negative of the results while some of the positive ones clearly have more results.

SIFE UNSW: the revival of frugal

January 30th, 2009

Well not quite.

Let me explain. For the past couple years, I’ve been the IT Manager of SIFEUNSW, the UNSW division of a much larger organization Students In Free Enterprise, which aims to bring young entrepreneur’s attention to non-profit charities.

One of the projects that we had in 2006-2007 was “Frugal: The magazine that made cents”, pun intended. The goal was to create an self sustaining online business magazine targeted at young people. Every week, the SIFEUNSW team working on frugal would approach people to interview, write guides to educate young people about personal finance, etc.

I only joined SIFE shortly after the end of the SIFE year (July), and did not see this project in operation, but from what I can tell, it was quite successful. Unfortunately, Andrew, the project leader for Frugal had already graduated that year and would not be participating in SIFEUNSW in the following year. Progress for the project halted as the beginning of the new SIFE year came around.

This is not uncommon for a project at SIFE. Much of the focus of SIFE is around an international competition held every year in July where hundreds of university students from various countries in the world present their projects to a panel of judges in front of an audience of fellow SIFErs, sponsors, charity workers, and successful entrepreneurs. SIFE teams spend so much time preparing for this competition, that once it ends, there is a period of relief and celebration that usually means down time for projects.

Unfortunately for Frugal, we never recovered from that down time and we were just short of making the project sustainable which would only require a few volunteers who enjoy writing, and a few regular guest posters a month, but building a team like that is easier said than done when nearly all of our human resources are business students who are busy studying and often also working.

The project has revived in the form of “Fully Frugal” which is a video version of the project with similar goals, but there has been no new content on Frugal since mid 2007.

Oh, and why is frugal ‘not quite’ reviving? I just noticed a 30% increase in traffic on website this month reversing a slow downward trend.

frugal_sife_trend

I wonder if the financial crisis is making people google for financial advice and driving up the traffic. The site is pretty well SEO optimized despite not having any new content for over a year.

Losing your identity in the tubes with google

December 25th, 2008

5 Years ago, when I googled myself for the first time, the main result that came up was “Charles M.A. Stine”, a material engineer who made explosives. Today, I find 52,900 results on google with unique people ranging from a dentist, an Inventor, an associates, an IT manager and about 20 others here. Indeed names are too common a tool for identification when you have more than a few hundred people not to mention the hundreds of millions on the internet.

Randall Munro originally used the 4 letter string ‘xkcd‘ to uniquely identify himself on the internet before his webcomic became famous. I though, “maybe it’s time I found a short meaningless unique identifier too”. I wrote a script to try and do just that:

import urllib
import re
#returns the string representation of the number
#note that strings of the form [a]+ will be skipped since numbers of the form [0]+ is equivolent to 0
def numToStr(num):
   str = ''
   while num <> 0:
      l = num%26
      str += chr(97 + l)
      num = num/26
   return str

#the page will have this string when no results are found
schstr = 'did not match any documents'
url = 'http://www.google.com/search?q='
for n in range(26**3, 26**4):
   str = numToStr(n)
   f = urllib.urlopen(url+str)
   for line in f
      if re.match(schstr, line):
         print str
         exit(0)
   f.close()

But evidently that’s against googles terms of service section 5.3

Google Error when doing searches with a script

5.3 You agree not to access (or attempt to access) any of the Services by any means other than through the interface that is provided by Google, unless you have been specifically allowed to do so in a separate agreement with Google. You specifically agree not to access (or attempt to access) any of the Services through any automated means (including use of scripts or web crawlers) and shall ensure that you comply with the instructions set out in any robots.txt file present on the Services.

I’m still looking for an answer: What is the shortest english alphabetic string for which google returns no search result. Of course the answer to this question this can’t be googled because as soon as the answer to this question ends up on googles search results, the result becomes invalid.

how to disable g-talks Remember Password option

December 1st, 2008

I recently checked the “remember password” box when I signed into g-talk. I didn’t want to do that because I was using a work computer that might be used by others. There seems to be no obvious ways to uncheck that option once it’s ticked since once you start g-talk, you are automatically signed in. There have been a couple posts on this in the google support forums, the answers suggested are not very helpful because either they don’t solve the problem or the instructions aren’t clear. One person’s advice was to uninstall and reinstall, which I think is too much trouble for such a small issue to fix.

http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Talk/thread?tid=7643a9633f70a5d1&hl=en

http://www.google.com/support/forum/p/Talk/thread?tid=264c17af8235957e&hl=en

So here’s the solution:

1. Sign out of g-talk

2. Uncheck the remember password box

Done, simple as that. The solution just wasn’t very obvious, and the support forums were next to useless.